irwazza wrote:Mine is installed in the same location, at the exhaust manifold, stopping the carbon before it gets anywhere
ML 3.2
sierra wrote:Snooozy wrote: I don't know of any 3.2's that had a cel from an EGR plate.
Read this thread after the blanking plates started getting fitted to find loads of 3.2's getting CEL's and limp modes.
biggibbo wrote:My blank is pre cooler and used to throw CEL's. I added the one way valve which sorted it out till the cheapie valve failed. I have since fitted a home brew valve and lengthened the hose prior to the valve to about 300mm. I know the home brew valve doesn't open below 5psi so it probably isn't helping to equalise the pressure. I think it's the 300mm of hose that is helping to avoid CEL's.
NitroGLXRin wrote:Hi all, back on again after many months.
I thought I had an egr problem around christmas when it was surging and wot not. Turned out it was fuel filter not egr. (I dont have mine closed....just gonna put the 10yr warranty to the test)
some food for thought after reading the last few posts......everyone knows egr is to reduce nox and it does this by reducing the temperature in the engine. so just putting it out there.......metalic materials strength and fatigue properties generally reduce with increased temperature. Now i doubt that you gonna bust anything because of egr blank plate, but if you do a simple explanation like this from mitsi engineers can put your warranty claim down the tube and you will have to know your shit or have some $'s to go to court to dispute it.
again just saying....everyone seems so sure that nothing will happen if u blank the egre....but cannot no for sure. I completely agree that dirty exhaust into your engine cannot be good....but mitsubishi and many other car designers do this and warrant this.
anyway....just something else to discuss. lol
irwazza wrote:I can Scan the one I got from chipit if that will help?
irwazza wrote:If the scale changes yep, does that mean I need to get off my ass?
koshari wrote:how do you attach a pdf?
sierra wrote:Since being able to switch the throttle body valve to wide open i've got a couple of fuel consumption results.
Small improvement and early days but at least it's not worse.
The last 4 fill ups were,
8.15L/100km - pre mod
8.15 - pre mod
7.94 - used for about half a tank
7.92 - used for the full tank
About 3% better economy. So it looks like a small gain there but the other gain is in the response and ability to take it down lower with smoother results. 60kph in 5th is viable instead of a bit of vibration as it complained before.
viking shippy wrote:Hi mate
I've beem reading your posts with intrest.
I've a ml can you post a final mods or how to on the fixes that you think are
The best for our Ml's and mn's
As this thread is long and hard to decider tah
Graham
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests