4wd26 wrote:Congrats mate looking forward to the review
Joel wrote:Nice prize but how much will it cost you for fitting and engineering?
Homer wrote:Good score, your garage sounds a bit like mine haha
ajg86 wrote:Has anyone had any experience with the karrman diff drop kit? I spoke to a mechanic in Canberra who fitted one and he gave it a pretty bad rap?
charger265 wrote:if you have any questions regarding the product or engineering Australia wide please contact the approved New Triton vendor "4WD Supplies"
NowForThe5th wrote:Who are no longer a forum sponsor.
charger265 wrote:I guess being allergic to bull shit brings the best out in me... I could also say the same for this forum locking posts and claiming i can reply in a new thread.. But that would be a breach of forum rules.. Yup.. nothing has changed...
BTW.. that was my point.. thinking it doesn't work just shows that he doesn't know what he is talking about (karrman kit)... But hey.. i guess that's just fact... and apparently we don't work off facts here.. just thoughts.. hmmmm whats that... never had a karrman kit to test you say??? Just theory???
And it would be interesting to see how the admin approve of a mod that requires cutting and welding of both the upper and lower control arm.. Im sure that will pass Australian standards...
Yup.. nothing has changed.. good work guys.. hats off to you all...
The double standards of supporting a member that is fabricating something that would never pass Australian standards that achieves the exact same thing is phrased as a switched on person who knows what he is doing... Yet you have someone else who has produced an approved and engineered kit for the Australian market yet all attempts were made to derail the products... Just love the double standards...
Edit: I also see the quite convenient deleting of posts where incriminating information is posted about admin abuse..
charger265 wrote:Well if we are such a giving forum could the admins please take the time to update the information regarding products and the incorrect information posted by admins???
To me it appears if there are double standards here.
Locking the post with all the incorrect information is what you could call dishonest as the correct information can not be updated. Also due to forum rules advising to start a new thread about the product as a vendor it is against forum rules without being an approved vendor. Again dishonest
Maybe the admins could stand by their word and allow a correction of information by a vendor and be allowed to link all the incorrect information (posts) as reference so there is no further confusion or muddying of the waters?
NowForThe5th wrote:Being allergic apparently doesn't stop you from spouting it.
After a 3 year hiatus and repeated statements that you would never post on this forum again, you return and open an old and pointless argument with completely unfounded allegations.
The thread was locked for exactly the reasons that I stated - that I did not want to see a return to the pointless arguments, bad blood and divisive tactics that characterised this thread and your previous time on NewTriton.
I made the offer that you could start a new thread if you had news that would be of interest to the members here. That offer remains open....
NowForThe5th wrote:I have dealt with this in the other thread, but to reiterate, the member concerned is both long standing and well respected here for his technical prowess and skills. He offered an opinion saying "I think that it doesn't work well!!!". If you disagree then by all means counter with factual and well supported argument, not vague accusations that he doesn't know what he's talking about, without any backing up of your statement. You're engaging in conduct that is no better than what you accuse him of.
NowForThe5th wrote:Let me be quite clear. The Administrators and Moderators of this forum do not "approve" any modification.
NowForThe5th wrote:It's the same as the one made by Tony (member here) under his SPV Industries brand.
Tony's been off the air after some bushfires in his area a while back but may be worth dropping him an email.
Tony wrote:They have released EGR off and DPF off ECU remap for MQ. (Can be organised through SPV Industries)
The plug and play version (EGR only) is sourced from SPV Industries, however not officially released yet but they do exist.
NowForThe5th wrote:What deleting of posts?
Posts are not deleted, they are removed and placed in a special area in the Moderators' section. I can tell you that exactly nine posts have been removed this year (2019) an most of these were either spam or unauthorized advertising. One contained some content that may have been of offense to certain religious groups. That's it.
NowForThe5th wrote:Nick, it is not the admins (sic) responsibility to update information on this forum. We do correct misinformation where necessary so that members are not misled. I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about when referring to "incorrect information posted by admins".
NowForThe5th wrote:Just to set the record straight, there is only one Administrator on this forum, plus a team of Moderators.
NowForThe5th wrote:Also, as has been explained to you before, we not only permit, but actually encourage you, as the developer of this product to keep us informed on technical issues that may be of interest to members. We do this because, as you have repeatedly stated, you are not the retailer of this product. No dishonesty and no double standards. Anyone who offers the product for sale to members must, in line with the Forum Rules, be a Forum Sponsor. Admittedly there have been a couple of cases where this rule was relaxed and members, who were not in business, were allowed to promote products that they made, at home and on a non-commercial basis.
NowForThe5th wrote:An invitation, from me, to start a new thread is a rare opportunity and one that should be taken advantage of.
NowForThe5th wrote:In the interests of transparency I have addressed not only the issues raised in your posts but also in your PM. I believe that this is important so that members understand in the event that they may see conflicting reports elsewhere.
The bottom line, Nick, is that we've given you more than a fair go and this has been in the interests of the members here who have shown significant interest in your product. Concerns have been raised about the legality of the product and whether it has gained any kind of engineering approval but you have, for some unknown reason, steadfastly refused to provide, here, any specifics on that. That doesn't detract from its interest to members and we would more than welcome you making public, at least on this forum, any information on this.
charger265 wrote:Why should i keep a group of member informed when all they have tried to do is derail the product on other forums and because they were not getting anywhere and have now decided to bring it in house where you have control over the content...
NowForThe5th wrote:It's a case of put up or shut up, Nick. Specific details will be welcomed. Continued trollish behaviour and trouble making will not.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests