Naff wrote:So how many of you would go and buy a MN second hand without knowing the history of what has been done around this campaign and without knowing the history of the vehicle?
Stoneman wrote:Bill, perfectly said and my opinion exatly!
Doesn't even own a MN!
borngeek wrote:Unfortunately you have nothing to say I am wrong.
//Doesn't help your resale value:
borngeek wrote:Stoneman wrote:Bill, perfectly said and my opinion exatly!
Doesn't even own a MN!
It's possibly best you don't post at all, Stoneman.
-- Bill, I am not going to quote your entire post as that would be annoying, so bear with me here.
I don't need to own a 2.5 to know it's a massive problem, as you've conceded it is. Only said it is unlikely you would get a long engine from MMAL given they are outside the production period. Some things are actual fact, evidenced. Yes opinions based upon them.
My early on stab was just that before I didn't actually think it is at all funny when friends that own them had them fail and got shoved through the system. Do i need to detail that?
This is happening and saying you can rely on that engine to not fail is a a load of shit. They're {censored} - that will confuse the moderators for 30 seconds... All of them. There is plenty of posts here to support my opinion... Unfortunately you have nothing to say I am wrong. Go ask mitsubishi and get stonewalled, you will get nowhere- because they have a legal team that will eat you for breakfast.
//Doesn't help your resale value, but they are cheap enough to begin with. Is a good secret though.
BillMcQuade wrote:Perhaps you should also brush up on your comprehension skills
borngeek wrote:Stoneman wrote:Bill, perfectly said and my opinion exatly!
Doesn't even own a MN!
It's possibly best you don't post at all, stoner.
-- Bill, I am not going to quote your entire post as that would be annoying, so bear with me here.
I don't need to own a 2.5 to know it's a massive problem, as you've conceded it is. Only said it is unlikely you would get a long engine from MMAL given they are outside the production period. Some things are actual fact, evidenced. Yes opinions based upon them.
My early on stab was just that before I didn't actually think it is at all funny when friends that own them had them fail and got shoved through the system. Do i need to detail that?
This is happening and saying you can rely on that engine to not fail is unreasonable. There is plenty of posts here to support my opinion... Unfortunately you have nothing to say I am wrong. Go ask mitsubishi and get stonewalled, you will get nowhere- because they have a legal team that will eat you for breakfast.
//Doesn't help your resale value, but they are cheap enough to begin with. Is a good secret though.
borngeek wrote:Hahaha yer buy me a MN that's what I want
Cowboy Dave wrote:Anyone else just get a MMAL promotional email about the great Aussie roadtrip?
srb wrote:I'm gunner need more popcorn! This is hilarious! [FACE WITH TEARS OF JOY]
NowForThe5th wrote:Cowboy Dave wrote:Anyone else just get a MMAL promotional email about the great Aussie roadtrip?
Yeah, with MY17 Pajero details. Euro5, power down 6kW and diff ratios down to 3.6, from 3.9. Even MNs will beat them now.
Maybe I should change my sig line to "Sucks to be you; glad I bought an NW"
NowForThe5th wrote:Cowboy Dave wrote:Anyone else just get a MMAL promotional email about the great Aussie roadtrip?
Yeah, with MY17 Pajero details. Euro5, power down 6kW and diff ratios down to 3.6, from 3.9. Even MNs will beat them now.
Maybe I should change my sig line to "Sucks to be you; glad I bought an NW"
Return to Drive Train Components
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests