revhead wrote:when is the actual date that these vehicles will arrive for a test run ?
You will have to ask a dealer for that answer. We know nothing
revhead wrote:when is the actual date that these vehicles will arrive for a test run ?
daryn wrote:revhead wrote:when is the actual date that these vehicles will arrive for a test run ?
You will have to ask a dealer for that answer. We know nothing
spargo wrote:Longer tray = smaller cabin space. The cabin space the Triton offers is what sells it over the other bench-seat boxes such as the BT-50 DC and Navara.
No thanks to a longer tray from me.. Even my alloy tray is only the same length that the original tub made the vehicle.
sierra wrote: More of a concern is that the 5 speed auto is not the one fitted to the Pajero and is therefore operating at it's design limit as is the old 4 speed. Mind you Monster Triton proved the 4 speed could handle more, especially with the tractor grade fluid transfusion.
sierra wrote:I thought the barge arse was an option?[Wonder if it still needs power steering?]
snowman wrote:i'm waitng for the first post of somebody who fully loads one of these things, hits the gas and wheelstands down their street .
pickle wrote:The box comes from the same family as the Pajero. Both have Aisin five speed autos. You might find only the ratio's are different.
Dave
Homer wrote:Same, same 3.2 mate...why don't they follow the Paj more closely?
By that I mean, and I don't want to upset things here but - go down to 2.5 never gunna be a winner ...
Homer wrote:Now that they are older the Triton is my vehicle of choice - body roll, fuel economy, a load of gravel/compressors/beer/dead mother in law and all round size difference is the kicker for me.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests